The International Trade Administration’s updated States and Cities Visited Monitor reveals an exceptionally uneven distribution of international visitors across the United States — and the implications for destination managers, tourism marketers and policymakers are significant.
United States (Tourism Reporter) — There is a map of America that international visitors draw for themselves, year after year, through their booking decisions, flight searches, hotel reservations and physical presence. And that map looks very different from the one many of America’s destination marketing organisations would prefer them to draw.
It is a map of extraordinary concentration: a handful of gateway states absorbing more than three-fifths of overseas visitor traffic, while a small group of major metropolitan areas accounts for nearly half of all international city visits. Beyond them lie vast stretches of a continent-sized country that capture only a fraction of international tourism demand — and, with it, the visitor spending, jobs, tax revenues and hospitality activity that accompany those arrivals.
The National Travel and Tourism Office’s U.S. States and Cities Visited Monitor, published for calendar year 2025 through the International Trade Administration’s data visualisation platform, provides the most authoritative annual picture of where international visitors actually go in the United States. The latest data confirms a pattern of extraordinary geographic concentration — one that deserves closer attention from destination managers, tourism policymakers, aviation strategists and officials at both state and federal level.
That concentration also raises a larger strategic question: if the United States wants to attract 100 million international visitors annually by 2030, where will those additional visitors go — and how will the country persuade them to look beyond the gateways they already know?
New York City: 8.915 Million and the Urban Primacy of the American Brand
New York City’s position as the leading U.S. city-MSA visited by overseas travellers — with 8.915 million international visitors in 2025 — is unsurprising given the strength of its global brand. But the scale of that dominance offers an important lesson for every other American urban destination competing for international attention.
New York is arguably the United States’ most powerful global city brand. Its skyline, neighbourhoods, cultural institutions and landmarks have been embedded in films, television, literature, music and popular culture for generations. That exposure has created something exceptionally valuable in destination marketing: pre-existing desire. Travellers arrive with an image of New York already formed long before they begin planning their trip.
The 8.915 million figure places New York ahead of Orlando, Los Angeles, Miami and every other U.S. metropolitan destination in the NTTO’s 2025 ranking. More significant than the lead itself, however, is the city’s ability to attract visitors from a remarkably diverse range of international markets.
New York also benefits from an unusually deep visitor economy. Premium hotels, global retail brands, Broadway, museums, restaurants, nightlife, major sporting events and internationally recognised attractions give overseas visitors multiple reasons to visit — and multiple opportunities to spend once they arrive.
For competing American destinations, the lesson is not that another city should attempt to become “the next New York”. It is that global tourism leadership is built when destination identity becomes embedded in the traveller’s imagination long before the booking is made.
New York’s advantage, ultimately, is not simply the number of visitors it receives. It is the extraordinary amount of global awareness that already exists before those visitors ever land.
The 62.5 Per Cent Concentration: America’s Geographic Inequality Problem
The combined 62.5 per cent share held by the five leading states is perhaps the clearest indication of the structural imbalance in America’s international tourism economy — and a significant consideration for the country’s ambition to reach 100 million international visitors annually.
Five states attract nearly two-thirds of all overseas visitors. That concentration is striking in a country of 50 states whose geography encompasses an extraordinary range of landscapes, cities, cultural experiences and natural attractions.
The remaining 45 states account for just 37.5 per cent of overseas visitor traffic. Among them are destinations with enormous international potential — from the Grand Canyon and Glacier National Park to Nashville, New Orleans, the Great Smoky Mountains, South Dakota’s Black Hills and the Route 66 corridor through Illinois.
The issue, therefore, is not simply whether these destinations have products worth visiting. Many clearly do. The challenge is access, visibility and distribution.
International visitors tend to follow established gateways because those gateways have the strongest air connectivity, the greatest concentration of accommodation and tourism infrastructure, and the highest levels of recognition in overseas markets. That creates a self-reinforcing cycle: more visitors support more flights; more flights improve accessibility; better accessibility encourages more visitors.
Breaking that cycle will require more than encouraging travellers to “visit beyond the gateways”. It will require better international air connectivity, stronger destination marketing, easier onward travel, and compelling reasons for visitors to extend their trips beyond the cities through which they first enter the country.
For America’s less-visited states, the opportunity is enormous. But converting that opportunity into international arrivals requires moving from a tourism model built around gateway concentration to one designed around geographic distribution.
The 48.9 Per Cent Urban Concentration: What City Primacy Means for Regional Tourism
The 48.9 per cent combined share of the five leading city-MSAs provides the urban counterpart to the concentration seen at state level — and highlights another structural challenge for destinations seeking a larger share of America’s international visitor economy.
New York, Los Angeles, Orlando, Miami and the other leading metropolitan gateway collectively account for almost half of overseas visitors recorded across U.S. city destinations. That leaves the remaining international visitor traffic distributed across a much larger group of metropolitan areas, including Chicago, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Boston, Washington, DC, Houston, Atlanta, Seattle, New Orleans and Nashville.
The significance goes beyond the rankings themselves. International visitors tend to build their American itineraries around recognised gateway cities, where direct air connectivity, established tourism infrastructure and global brand recognition reinforce one another. For less dominant urban destinations, competing for international visitors therefore requires more than having an attractive tourism product. They must overcome the accessibility and awareness advantages enjoyed by the established gateways.
Chicago offers an instructive example. The Illinois tourism performance covered by Tourism Reporter last week — 115 million total visitors and more than $50 billion in visitor spending in 2025 — demonstrates the scale of the wider state tourism economy. O’Hare International Airport provides Chicago with a formidable connectivity platform, supporting both domestic and international demand.
Yet Chicago’s international tourism position remains smaller than its overall economic and domestic tourism profile might suggest. That gap makes international air connectivity particularly important. The United Airlines expansion announced for 2027, which Tourism Reporter covered on 26 August, is part of the infrastructure required to strengthen Chicago’s connections with additional international markets.
The wider lesson is clear: city tourism growth is increasingly a connectivity game as much as a marketing game. A destination can possess the attractions, hotels and visitor infrastructure to compete globally, but without the flights and distribution networks that put it within easy reach of international travellers, its potential remains largely unrealised.
The Policy Takeaway: What the Monitor Demands From Decision-Makers
The 2025 NTTO States and Cities Visited Monitor carries a clear message for destination managers, tourism policymakers, DMO leaders, aviation executives and government officials shaping America’s international tourism strategy.
The concentration of overseas visitors — 62.5 per cent across the five leading states and 48.9 per cent across the five leading city-MSAs — is not simply a measure of where international visitors go today. It highlights where the greatest opportunity to broaden America’s visitor economy may lie.
For the United States to move towards its 100 million international visitor ambition, growth will need to extend beyond the established gateways. That means stronger investment in secondary destination marketing, regional aviation connectivity and internationally relevant tourism products that give visitors compelling reasons to extend their journeys beyond the cities through which they first enter the country.
Puerto Rico’s 60.1 per cent increase offers an encouraging example of what can happen when a destination strengthens its product, marketing and accessibility over time. Its performance demonstrates that the map of international tourism is not fixed.
It can be redrawn.
The strategic question for America’s less-visited destinations is whether they are prepared to make the sustained investments required to put themselves on that map — and stay there.
Discover more from Tourism Reporter
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


